Women & Girls Only, All Ages >> Us, Us & Them: Interpersonal Relationships and Community

Pages: 1
JennyAdministrator
Be-Musing Momma


Reged: Jun 12 2006
Posts: 236
Loc: Minnesota
Freedom to marry
      #4774 - Thu Jun 12 2008 06:12 PM

There is an extended feminist debate to be had (and that has been had) over the desirability of marriage as an institution. Without getting into that right now (I myself chose to get married, and appreciate the many ways in which participating in a feminist marriage can be both challenging and rewarding), I wanted to share this statement from the late Mildred Loving, whose interracial marriage led to a legal milestone in the US for the freedom to marry. I love that Ms. Loving extended her concern to gays and lesbians--not to mention how incredibly appropriate her and her husband's last name turned out to be!

Quote:

Loving for All

By Mildred Loving*

Prepared for Delivery on June 12, 2007,
The 40th Anniversary of the Loving vs. Virginia Announcement

When my late husband, Richard, and I got married in Washington, DC in 1958, it wasn’t to make a political statement or start a fight. We were in love, and we wanted to be married.

We didn’t get married in Washington because we wanted to marry there. We did it there because the government wouldn’t allow us to marry back home in Virginia where we grew up, where we met, where we fell in love, and where we wanted to be together and build our family. You see, I am a woman of color and Richard was white, and at that time people believed it was okay to keep us from marrying because of their ideas of who should marry whom.

When Richard and I came back to our home in Virginia, happily married, we had no intention of battling over the law. We made a commitment to each other in our love and lives, and now had the legal commitment, called marriage, to match. Isn’t that what marriage is?

Not long after our wedding, we were awakened in the middle of the night in our own bedroom by deputy sheriffs and actually arrested for the “crime” of marrying the wrong kind of person. Our marriage certificate was hanging on the wall above the bed. The state prosecuted Richard and me, and after we were found guilty, the judge declared: “Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix.” He sentenced us to a year in prison, but offered to suspend the sentence if we left our home in Virginia for 25 years exile.

We left, and got a lawyer. Richard and I had to fight, but still were not fighting for a cause. We were fighting for our love.

Though it turned out we had to fight, happily Richard and I didn’t have to fight alone. Thanks to groups like the ACLU and the NAACP Legal Defense & Education Fund, and so many good people around the country willing to speak up, we took our case for the freedom to marry all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. And on June 12, 1967, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that, “The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men,” a “basic civil right.”

My generation was bitterly divided over something that should have been so clear and right. The majority believed that what the judge said, that it was God’s plan to keep people apart, and that government should discriminate against people in love. But I have lived long enough now to see big changes. The older generation’s fears and prejudices have given way, and today’s young people realize that if someone loves someone they have a right to marry.

Surrounded as I am now by wonderful children and grandchildren, not a day goes by that I don’t think of Richard and our love, our right to marry, and how much it meant to me to have that freedom to marry the person precious to me, even if others thought he was the “wrong kind of person” for me to marry. I believe all Americans, no matter their race, no matter their sex, no matter their sexual orientation, should have that same freedom to marry. Government has no business imposing some people’s religious beliefs over others. Especially if it denies people’s civil rights.

I am still not a political person, but I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, black or white, young or old, gay or straight seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.




--------------------
No matter what your fight, don’t be ladylike! God Almighty made women and the Rockefeller gang of thieves made the ladies. ~Mother Jones


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
apple



Reged: Apr 19 2010
Posts: 43
Loc: guangdong,china
Re: Freedom to marry [Re: Jenny]
      #4906 - Wed May 05 2010 09:30 PM

abercrombie fitch The first abercrombie International Fashion Week abercrombie and fitch Hercynian located in the 21st century fashion leisure abercrombie clothing fashion brand incubator to attract from across the Taiwan Strait and the full range of internationally renowned designer attention and participation, demonstration of cross-strait costume fashion charm, and efforts to attract nationally representative, mainstream famous brands to participate, showing the original brand of style, leisure clothing industry in China today show the latest developments, reveals the development of new leisure fashion trends. Ended and the Thirteenth Haibo turnover reached 7.8 billion including interest, clothing turnover 3.448 billion yuan, accounting for 10.9%, 10.9% Bi Zeng; surface supplies turnover 2.042 billion yuan, accounting for 11.46%, Bi Zeng 11.46%; textiles turnover 2.038 billion yuan machinery, accounting for 11.46%, 35.87% Bi Zeng; abercrombie online clothing apparel CAD 285 million information transactions, abercrombie online store accounting for 9.2%, 9.2% Bi Zeng abercrombie outlet.

--------------------
abercrombie and fitch


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
chenlng



Reged: Jun 23 2010
Posts: 10
Loc: USA
Re: Freedom to marry [Re: apple]
      #4931 - Wed Jun 23 2010 03:55 AM

Perhaps I can best illustrate by imagining what I should most like to see if I were given the use of my eyesed hardy bags, say, for just three dayslinks of london bracelet. And while I am imagining, suppose you, too, set your mind to work on the problem of how you would use your own eyes if you had only three more days to see. If with the on-coming darkness of the third night you knew that the sun would never rise for you againlinks of london charms, how would you spend those three precious intervening dayslink of london? What would you most want to let your gaze rest upon?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1



Extra information
0 registered and 1 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Daniella, Heather, Brooke, Celine, CarolineBelle, Eileen 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 1290

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us | Privacy statement Back to the All Girl Army

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.2